Impact Of Constituency Development Fund On Rural Development In Gatundu South Constituency
Date
2013
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
KCA University
Abstract
The Constituency Development Fund (CDF) was adopted by the government in 2003 as a
people centered approach to development. The study examined the impact of the CDF on
rural development in the Gatundu South Constituency. The study was guided by three
specific objectives which included; establishing the effect of community participation in rural
development in Gatundu South Constituency; to determine the role of CDF management in
rural development in Gatundu South Constituency; to determine effect of type of projects
implemented through the CDF on rural development in Gatundu South Constituency. The
study also presented the theoretical and empirical literature on which the study is premised
along with the conceptual framework. The study adopted the descriptive research design.
Stratified random sampling procedures were adopted to identify the sample for the study. A
structured questionnaire was the primary tool for data collection and was be self –
administered to the study respondents. The researcher adopted descriptive statistics to make
meaningful inferences from the collected information which included correlation analysis and
the chi-square tests. The data was presented in tables, charts which were in percentages and
frequencies and complemented by the researchers own interpretation in verbatim. The
correlation analysis indicated that community participation in project processes is strongly
and positively correlated to rural development with a correlation coefficient of r = 0.729 and
is significant, p = 0.000 type of projects funded by the CDF is positively correlated to rural
development as denoted by the coefficient of r = 0.812 and is significant, p = 0.001. Further
the matrix indicated a positive correlation between CDF management and rural development
by the coefficient of r = 0.622. The chi-square statistic of community participation was p =
0.317 the p-value were greater than 0.05 and hence there was no statistically significant
association between community participation and rural development. The chi-square statistics
of type of CDF projects was p = 0.031 the p – value was less than 0.05 and hence there was a
statistically significant relationship between type of CDF projects and rural development. The
chi-square statistic of CDF management was p = 0.739 the p – value was greater than 0.05
and hence there was no significant relationship between CDF management and rural
development. The study recommends for increase in the CDF allocation, CDF mandated
bodies should continuously device effective communication techniques to enhance
community involvement in projects processes. There should be provision of training and
capacity building for project management committee members in project management skills
which will assist them in implementing projects that fulfill the four criterions of time, budget,
scope and quality.
Description
Keywords
CDF, CDF Projects, Rural Development