Long-term Performance Of Initial Public Offerings At Nairobi Securities Exchange Market, Kenya.
Date
2015
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
KCA University
Abstract
The empirical evidence accumulated during recent years for every capital market in the world is
devious in its conclusion that initial Public Offering (IPO) provides significant abnormal returns
on their first day of trading, which is then followed by a considerable underperformance that
extends beyond one year. Various studies that underperformance of IPOs extends beyond the
first year of trading. This paper investigates the long-term (from one year through to five years)
returns of IPOs listed in the Nairobi Securities Exchange (NSE) market in order to provide a
more recent case of performance of IPOs in Kenya. A total number of 7 IPOs listed and traded in
the NSE for a period of five years starting from 2006 to 2013 were thoroughly analysed. The
long-term performance of IPOs was estimated by computing the returns using the Cumulative
Abnormal Return (CAR) on the 7 IPOs as individual stocks as well as a portfolio for a period of
60months after the IPO issue. Further computation was done using the Buy and Hold Abnormal
Return (BHAR) over similar period. The NSE 20 Share Index was used as a benchmark to gauge
the IPO performance in the same economic conditions environment. There are many factors that
lead to the underperformance of IPOs. The literature provides theories which investors have
continuously ignored and gone ahead to invest only for the issuers to take advantage of insider
information. Future investment through IPOs is reduced due to the continued underperformance
of such stocks, ending up being a hard lesson to the investors. The findings in this paper indicate
that underperformance of IPOs undoubtedly continues beyond one year. However,
underperformance is not evident in all IPOs but when taken as a portfolio, the underperformance
is more discernible. IPOs issued during the hot period tend to have a too high first aftermarket
pricing which then leads to continued underperformance several years after issue. The fads
theory cannot be ignored since the benchmark performance appears to follow the long-term
performance of IPO portfolio in the period covered by the study.
Description
Keywords
IPO, Returns, Long-term performance, over performance, Underperformance, portfolio, benchmark